5 6Īccording to the 65 Project, then-President Trump and a group of lawyers attempted to steal the 2020 presidential election by filing dozens of false lawsuits to disrupt the electoral process and permit Trump or his sympathizers to use their power to overturn the election results. The 65 Project was launched to punish lawyers who supported President Trump and to dissuade future attempts to overturn elections on illegitimate grounds. The name “65 Project” refers to the number of lawsuits filed by supporters of President Donald Trump to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
1 LawWorks has previously received grants from public policy-oriented foundation Democracy Fund and is a fiscal project of the Franklin Education Forum, a nonprofit organization that provides training and support to, “advance and broaden the appeal of the progressive cause.” 2 3 It is a project of Law Works, a group with no website or public financial disclosures. The 65 Project was “devised” by Democratic consultant and former Clinton administration official Melissa Moss. Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.The 65 Project is a campaign targeting lawyers who aided attempts by then-President Donald Trump and his supporters to overturn the 2020 election results using advertisements, threats of disbarment, and changing rules within the American Bar Association, ostensibly to deter future similar efforts. In sanctions push, Detroit says Powell, Wood have blood on their hands Judge eyes sanctions on pro-Trump lawyers who claimed voter fraud
'Profound abuse': Judge disciplines pro-Trump lawyers over election lawsuit Pro-Trump lawyers face $200,000 legal bill for 'frivolous' election case We handle a small number of high-stakes cases, and our practice is doing very well. We're not the kind of practice, though, that is turning over large volume. I suspect this makes it a little more likely to send work to us. Nobody calls and says, "I saw you on Rachel Maddow, so I want to retain you." But you become top of mind. REUTERS: How has this case affected your practice? Has it been good for business?įINK: It's hard to know what inspires somebody to call you. Her co-counsel repeatedly called for such an evidentiary hearing.)
Attorney david fink trial#
(Powell asserted during a July court hearing she had carefully vetted her election fraud claims before suing, and that the only way to test them would have been at trial or a hearing on evidence gathered. They're paying a price and the price they pay, God willing, will stop this nonsense in 2024. Not one of them filed these ridiculous lawsuits, and of the nine lawyers who filed and participated in the lawsuit in front of Judge Parker, not one of them understood Michigan election law. We have some wonderful, experienced, intelligent, ethical lawyers who represent the Republican Party and Republican candidates. REUTERS: Do you think you'll be seeing election conspiracy claims again in the next presidential election?įINK: Of course I hope not, and it's exactly that concern that has driven our passion to be sure that the lawyers who brought these cases are sanctioned. Both said they played no role in inciting the rioters – Powell has previously called that "inflammatory, false hogwash" while Wood has described it as "errant nonsense.") (Both Powell and Wood have denied any connection between their election claims and the attack on the Capitol by pro-Trump supporters. But in the weeks and months since then, you've been quite clear about your views on the culpability of these particular attorneys.įINK: I start from the other side, which is, how did the litigation affect the attack? I am absolutely certain that if it weren't for the validation of insane conspiracy theories that were provided by this litigation, if it were not for that validation, Jan. Capitol affected this case? Because you sought sanctions prior to Jan. REUTERS: How do you think the attack on the U.S. We don't do that much of our work in public. Second, we had this unusual and unexpected opportunity to be in the public eye while we were doing that.
First, it was a great case, because we knew we were doing the right thing.
0 kommentar(er)
